Summary

Yosef Karo Shulchan Aruch — Choshen Mishpat 34

Paragraph 11- One who lends money of orphans out with interest, even literal interest, would not be disqualified from testifying because he thinks he is doing a mitzvah by having the orphan’s property turn a profit.
Paragraph 12- If a witness that signed on a document had died, and witnesses testify that the deceased would lend to other Jews with literal interest and it is well-known that he was a guardian or the agent of a gentile we assume that he lent the gentile’s money with interest. Similarly, if he was a guardian, we assume he lent the orphans’ money with interest.
Source: Wikisource

Yosef Karo Shulchan Aruch — Choshen Mishpat 34

Paragraph 25- A person cannot disqualify himself due to sin. Rather, witnesses must testify against him because a person cannot establish himself as wicked. Nevertheless, we would not make him a witness in the first instance as is discussed later in 92:5. Similarly, we do not disqualify based on a rumor or mere suspicion such as where someone is suspect in the area of immoral relations because he often secludes himself with forbidden relations and rumors have spread. Such a person is valid for all testimony with exception of testimony for a woman.
Source: Wikisource

Yosef Karo Shulchan Aruch — Choshen Mishpat 34

Paragraph 1- A wicked person is disqualified from testifying. Even a valid witnesses that knows his colleague is wicked, but the judges are unaware, is prohibited from testifying with him, even though the testimony is accurate. All the more so in a case where a valid witness has testimony for a party and he knows that his co-witness is a false witness, is he prohibited from testifying with him.
Paragraph 2- Who is considered wicked? One who violates a prohibition that is deserving of lashes.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature