Summary

anon An answer to a pamphlet, intitled… (1768)

Thus far then, Sir, we are agreed, that the only method of reducing the present high price of Provisions, is by reducing the national debt, and the only method of reducing the national debt, is by reducing the expences of government, or (as you emphatically express it) by narrowing those channels, through which the riches of the public have flowed in such torrents into the pockets of private men.
Source: Wikisource

anon An answer to a pamphlet, intitled… (1768)

I will, however, take upon me to affirm, that, if you mean, as by the whole strain of your reasoning you seem to mean, that the increase of our national debt increases the wealth of the nation in general, you mean a most glaring absurdity; as the transferring of property from one person to another, and still more the transferring it from the laborious and the poor to the idle and the rich, can never increase the general wealth of the kingdom.
Source: Wikisource

anon An answer to a pamphlet, intitled… (1768)

I entirely agree with you, Sir, in thinking, that all the complaints against forestallers, regraters, monopolizers, and engrossers, are, in a great measure, groundless; and that whatever effect the arts of those men may have had in raising the price of Provisions, they could have had little or none at all, had it not been for the great increase of our national debt, and, of consequence, the increase of our ideal money, or paper-credit.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature