Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Folger v. United States — Opinion of the Court

It is indispensable, however, that every facility shall be given by the government for their purchase and distribution. The consumption of stamps in New York alone is very large, while the amount which is naturally distributed from that city is no small part of the supply for the whole country. It seems to me very advisable, therefore, because of their great value, that they should be kept, as other property of the government is kept, in the possession of the government itself until actual sale.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Folger v. United States — Opinion of the Court

It will be observed that while the act of Aug. 23, 1842, allows an officer having a fixed salary to receive additional pay, extra allowance, or compensation, if 'the appropriation therefor explicitly states that it is for such additional pay, extra allowance, or compensation,' the act of 1876 contains no such reservation in favor of assistant treasurers of the United States.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Folger v. United States — Opinion of the Court

For instance, upon the theory advanced by appellant's counsel, a purchaser, from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, of common stamps to the amount, at one time, of $1,000 or more, would be allowed five per cent as commissions, payable in stamps (which, in such cases, would be the full extent of the government's loss) , while upon a sale, through an assistant treasurer of the United States, to the same purchaser of the same stamps, in sealed packages, the government would lose altogether ten per cent in commissions,-five per cent to the assistant treasurer, and five per cent to the purchaser
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature