“ It was not until the Friday that it was able to march back again from the field in which [Pg 90] it had triumphed at so terrible an expense of numbers, guns, and colours, and with so null a strategic result, and to take up once more the siege of Mons. Upon the 9th of October Mons capitulated, furnishing the sole fruit of this most arduous of all the great series of Marlborough’s campaigns.No battle has been contested with more valour or tenacity than the battle of Malplaquet. The nature of the woodland fighting contributed to the enormous losses sustained upon either side. ”
Battle of Malplaquet
Definition and stakes
The Battle of Malplaquet, fought on 11 September 1709 during the War of the Spanish Succession, was a crucial and bloody confrontation between French troops under Marshal Villars and the Grand Alliance forces commanded by Marlborough. Although the Allies achieved a narrow triumph, they endured heavy losses, which weakened their strategic advantage. Historians such as Hilaire Belloc highlight its severe consequences and unclear tactics, while L.
Würdig emphasizes its intensity and the somber aftermath. The battle's heavy price altered military campaigns, allowing France to secure more advantageous terms, as Villars’ defense maintained the cohesion of his army. This engagement, characterized by fortified positions and unrelenting attacks, exemplifies the war’s wearing nature and its significant influence on European power structures.
Quotes about “Battle of Malplaquet”
L. Würdig, Prince Eugene, the Noble Knight
“ Only twelve squadrons of the imperial cavalry harassed them on their retreat, which was conducted skilfully by Bouffleurs.The battle of Malplaquet, as the fight over the French intrenchments was called, was one of the fiercest of the War of the Spanish Succession. The loss on both sides in dead and wounded was about the same, probably about thirty-six thousand men. The great battle-field was horrible to look upon. Where the Dutch battalions of the guard had stood, the corpses lay in ranks before the intrenchments, most of them stripped of their clothes and horribly mutilated. ”
“ Strategically the victory meant that an army which it was intended to destroy had maintained itself intact; morally, the battle left the defeated more elated than the victors; and for this reason, that the result was so much more in their favour than the expectation had been. In what is most important of all, the general fortunes of the campaign, the victory of the allies at [Pg 23] Malplaquet was as sure a signal that the advance on Paris could not be made, and as sure a prevention of that advance as though Marlborough and Eugene had registered, not a success, but a defeat. ”
