Fitzjames Stephen

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Leslie Stephen Leslie Stephen,  The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen…

“ And there is one thing which, as I venture to believe, no one can deny, or deny to be worth considering. Whatever may be thought of Fitzjames's judgments of men and things, it must be granted that he may be called, in the emphatical and lofty sense of the word, a true man. In the dark and bewildering game of life he played his part with unfaltering courage and magnanimity. He was a man not only in masculine vigour of mind and body, but in the masculine strength of affection, which was animated and directed to work by strenuous moral convictions. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Leslie Stephen Leslie Stephen,  The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen…

“ They would rather cover their strongest emotions under some veil of indirect insinuation, whether of playful caress or ironical depreciation, than write them down in explicit and unequivocal assertions. [240] That, however, was not Fitzjames's style in any case. His words were in all cases as straightforward and downright as if he were giving evidence upon oath. If he thinks ill of a man, he calls him bluntly a 'scoundrel' or 'a poor creature,' and when he speaks of those who were nearest and dearest to him he uses language of corresponding directness and energy. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Leslie Stephen Leslie Stephen,  The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen…

“ To try to regulate the finer relations of life by law, or even by public opinion, is 'like trying to pull an eyelash out of a man's eye with a pair of tongs: they may pull out the eye, but they will never get hold of the eyelash.' [137] But it is not the end, but the means that are objectionable. Fitzjames does not object in principle even to sumptuary laws. He can never, he says, look at a lace machine, and think of all the toil and ingenuity wasted, with patience. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature