“ Brant had listened impatiently, for a new idea had seized him. Hooker was of the party, and was the one man in whom he could partly confide, and obtain a disguise. He at once made his way to the commissary wagons—one of which he knew Hooker used as a tent. Hastily telling him that he wished to visit the pickets without recognition, he induced him to lend him his slouched hat and frock coat, leaving with him his own distinguishing tunic, hat, and sword. He resisted the belt and pistols which Hooker would have forced upon him. ”
Hooker
Definition and stakes
The surname Hooker, originating from occupational or agricultural backgrounds, has a rich and varied history across different cultures and periods, often linked to prominent individuals in various fields. From the 19th-century botanist Joseph Dalton Hooker to the Civil War general Joseph Hooker, the name reflects a wide array of accomplishments. In literature, it appears with significance, such as in Bret Harte’s portrayal of Hooker as a practical companion in Clarence, or in H.G.
Wells’ mention of Hooker in The Country of the Blind, where the name adds depth to the narrative. Izaak Walton’s homage to Richard Hooker highlights the surname’s scholarly heritage, while military records emphasize its role in key historical conflicts. These diverse representations illustrate the name’s versatility, connecting it to science, conflict, and narrative imagination.
Quotes about “Hooker”
Benson John Lossing,
The Pictorial Field-Book of the Revolution…
“ Hooker and his wife, with about one hundred men, women, and children of his flock, left Cambridge the following year, and marched June 1636 through the wilderness westward to the pioneer settlement, subsisting, on the journey, upon the milk of a herd of cows which they drove before them. Over hills and mountains, through thickets and marshes, they made their way, with no guide but a compass, no shelter but the heavens and the trees, no bed save the bare earth, relying upon Divine Providence and their own indomitable perseverance for success. ”
Carl Schurz,
Hooker Inquiry (Wauhatchie Engagement…
“ It is almost impossible to suppose that General Hooker did not know the Brigades to be there; for, if he-had eyes to see, ears to hear, and a mind to understand, he must have been aware of their presence. But it is almost equally impossible to suppose that he did know them to be there, for, how strange is it, how can it be explained, that he did not send them forward, if he wanted to have Tyndale’s Hill occupied, and Geary reinforced at the same time—and, above all, how can his report be accounted for? ”
