Secretary of State for War

Definition and stakes

L. S. Amery The Empire and the century — Imperial Defence and National Policy (1905)

Under such circumstances the Secretary of State for War is usually a nonentity, or, if not, he wears himself out by his vain efforts to force through his schemes against the passive obstruction of his colleagues and the indifference of the nation. Behind the Secretary of State there stands the War Office disorganized and emasculated by the hopelessness of ever getting anything done, or ever finding out what it is wanted to do, and from the War Office hopelessness and indifference spread throughout the army.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Spenser Wilkinson Spenser Wilkinson Lessons of the War: Being Comments from Week to Week to the Relief of Ladysmith

The management of a war can never be taken out of the hands of the Government, because the body which decides when to make preparations is, by the fact that it has the power of making that decision, the supreme authority. If, therefore, a Nation wishes to have reasonable assurance against defeat it must take means to provide the supreme authority with a military judgment. The British system for a, long time professed to do this by giving the Secretary of State for War a military adviser who was Commander-in-Chief.
Source: Gutenberg

Earl of Evelyn Baring Cromer Political and Literary essays, 1908-1913

Secretary of State for War should be a soldier unconnected with politics. Even although Lord Wolseley does not state this conclusion in so many words, it is notorious to any one who is familiar with the views current in army circles that the adoption of this plan is considered by many to be the best, if it be not the only, solution of all our military difficulties.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature