Joshua Girling Fitch

Biographical details

Joshua Girling Fitch,  Dictionary of National Biography… (1892)

“ It was merely a system of drill and mechanism by which large bodies of children could be made orderly and obedient, and by which the scholars who knew a little were made to help those who knew less. Neither the writings nor the practice of Bell and Lancaster threw any light on the principles of teaching, or were of any value as permanent contributions to the literature of education. But relatively to the special needs and circumstances of the age, and to the wretched provision which then existed for the education of the poor, the work of these two men was of enormous value. ”
Source: Wikisource

Joshua Girling Fitch,  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 16… (1911)

“ To do them justice, it must be owned that the rival claims and merits of Bell and Lancaster were urged with more passion and unfairness by their friends than by themselves. Yet neither is entitled to hold a very high place among the world’s teachers. Bell was cold, shrewd and self-seeking. Lancaster had more enthusiasm, a genuine and abounding love for children, and some ingenuity in devising plans both for teaching and governing. ”
Source: Wikisource

Joshua Girling Fitch,  Dictionary of National Biography… (1892)

“ The friends of Bell avowedly wished to bring the schools for the poor under the control of the church of England. Lancaster, on the other hand, always preached the doctrine that it was not the business of the public school to serve the denominational interests of any particular section of the Christian church, and that the true national education of the future should be Christian but not sectarian. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature