Summary

"A Clergyman" Review of a Pamphlet from the Churchman's Magazine… (1871)

PLAIN MEANING OF THE PROHIBITION IN LEV. XVIII. 18.—THE MAGAZINE WRITER'S ABSURD EXAMPLES.
So much at present on the translation of the verse. Let us now briefly notice the prohibition, "thou shalt not take a wife to her sister, &c.," a prohibition understood in all ages, as the words expressly declare, as relating to two sisters. The law of Moses assumes the existance of polygamy, and regulated it, (Exodus xxi. 9–12; Deuteronomy xxi. 15–17) , but does not forbid it. The prophet denounced David's adultery, but directly recognized his polygamy (II Samuel xii. 8.)
Source: Wikisource

"A Clergyman" Review of a Pamphlet from the Churchman's Magazine… (1871)

When a writer, to support his dogma, can boldly deny in one place that a brother means a brother, and in another place leave out the two important names that determine the whole meaning of the passage, he can do all that Bishop Colenzo has done in the way of reckless criticism, to undermine both the authorized translation and integrity, not only of one book but, of the five books of Moses.
Source: Wikisource

"A Clergyman" Review of a Pamphlet from the Churchman's Magazine… (1871)

By a recent decision of the House of Lords, Charles Armitage Brook, the issue of an exactly similar marriage, born in 1864, is declared illigitimate, and his inheritance forfeited to the Crown. We utter not a word of reproach against His Grace, or the amiable and estimable ladies of the Beaufort family; but the public welfare demands that the existence of such an anomaly should be clearly made known, in order to its being immediately remedied.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature