"A Clergyman"

Biographical details

"A Clergyman",  Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister (1871)

“ Can any one not swayed by prejudice believe that a phrase used thirty-four times in the Hebrew Bible in the same identical sense, is used the thirty-fifth time in a totally different sense? For my own part, if I could see no meaning in the last case, I should feel bound to remain in the rendering of all the other cases, leaving the meaning for future illumination. Assuredly we must adhere to the fixed meaning of Bible phrases, unless we would make the Scripture what an irreverent Cardinal called it, "a nose of wax." ”
Source: Wikisource

"A Clergyman",  Review of a Pamphlet from the Churchman's Magazine… (1871)

“ When a writer, to support his dogma, can boldly deny in one place that a brother means a brother, and in another place leave out the two important names that determine the whole meaning of the passage, he can do all that Bishop Colenzo has done in the way of reckless criticism, to undermine both the authorized translation and integrity, not only of one book but, of the five books of Moses. ”
Source: Wikisource

"A Clergyman",  Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister (1871)

“ Where is there an unperverted mind which does not feel that the moral relation of two sisters successively to one or the same man as husband, is strictly parallel to that of two brothers to one and the same woman as wife? And even if the Law, in spite of this moral identity, did not entirely recognize the practical equality of obligation in both cases, there is no reason why Christians should not do it. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature