Acting Justice Belinda van Heerden, in the Constitutional Court of South Africa

Summary

Acting Justice Belinda van Heerden, in the Constitutional Court of South Africa Gory v Kolver NO and Others (2006)

As with all inheritance disputes, it is distressing to see people who apparently cared deeply for the deceased in their own ways set at loggerheads over the question of entitlement to the deceased’s estate. I do not consider it to be in the interests of justice and equity that the second and third respondents be mulcted in costs. For reasons on which I will elaborate below, I am of the view that the fairest solution would be to order the fifth respondent (the Minister) to pay the costs incurred by Mr Gory in the High Court.
Source: Wikisource

Acting Justice Belinda van Heerden, in the Constitutional Court of South Africa Gory v Kolver NO and Others (2006)

This doctrine, known as “objective constitutional invalidity”, means that an unconstitutional law in force at the time of the commencement of the interim Constitution might be invalidated by that Constitution with effect from 27 April 1994, even if the applicant’s cause of action arose after the coming into force of the 1996 Constitution on 4 February 1997. [48] Thus, in terms of section 172 (1) (a) of the Constitution, a court deciding a constitutional matter must declare any law or conduct that is inconsistent with the Constitution to be invalid to the extent of its inconsistency.
Source: Wikisource

Acting Justice Belinda van Heerden, in the Constitutional Court of South Africa Gory v Kolver NO and Others (2006)

As was argued by the Starke sisters, the rationale in previous court decisions for using reading-in to extend the ambit of statutory provisions applicable to spouses/married couples so as to include permanent same-sex life partners was that same-sex couples are unable legally to marry and hence to bring themselves within the ambit of the relevant statutory provision. Once this impediment is removed, then there would appear to be no good reason for distinguishing between unmarried heterosexual couples and unmarried same-sex couples in respect of intestate succession.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature