Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Cotting v. Godard — Opinion of the Court

Why should not the nine employees who work for one corporation be equally protected with the eleven engaged in the same line of employment for another corporation? If such law is beneficial to wage earners in the one instance, why not in the other? The nine men lawfully paid for their labor in goods at a truck store might with much reason complain that the protection of the law was unequal as to them when they saw eleven men paid in money for the same service performed for another corporation engaged in a like business. Such inequality destroys the law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Cotting v. Godard — Opinion of the Court

Suppose a statute that every corporation failing to establish its entire claim, or make good its entire defense, should as a penalty therefor forfeit its corporate franchise, and that no penalty of any kind except the matter of cost was attached to like failures of other litigants, could it be said that the corporations received the equal protection of the laws?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Cotting v. Godard — Opinion of the Court

But while recognizing to the full extent the impossibility of an imposition of duties and obligations mathematically equal upon all, and also recognizing the right of classification of industries and occupations, we must nevertheless always remember that the equal protection of the laws is guaranteed, and that such equal protection is denied when upon one of two parties engaged in the same kind of business and under the same conditions burdens are cast which are not cast upon the other.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature