Summary

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Act in Relation to the Uncertainties in Trade (1920)

Well has the Supreme Court said that such guessing is not a judicial function, that: "To compel men to guess on peril of indictment what the community would have given for their wares, if the continually changing conditions were other than they are, to an uncertain extent; to divine prophetically what the reaction of only partially determinate facts would be upon the imagination and desires of purchasers, is to exact gifts that mankind does not possess."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Act in Relation to the Uncertainties in Trade (1920)

What always happens when scarcity appears is that "the trade," indeed the whole world, insists upon the duty of increased production. As a result, wages and everything necessary in production advance. Costs sink to a second place. People having been frightened inevitably hoard, and finally when the joint effort of the world oversteps the market, there come the collapses called "panics," and thousands of business men are swept to ruin.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Act in Relation to the Uncertainties in Trade (1920)

The Fifth Amendment is really of no consequence, if all that is necessary to deprive citizens of their property is for a Court to determine that the public needs the property, and, therefore, has a right to impair or destroy that which alone constitutes its value. If this really be the law, the inspiring opinion of the Supreme Court in the Monongahela Case [28] has been overruled. The great necessity for a commodity naturally increases its value. But it is contended that that which creates value deprives it of the protection which the Constitution gives it.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature