Summary

Portrait of George Santayana George Santayana Egotism in German Philosophy — Chapter IX. Egotism and Selfishness (1916)

The conclusion of Max Stirner, that because those idols are false, and the worship of them is cruel and superstitious, therefore we must worship nothing and merely enjoy in a piggish way what we may call our own, is a conclusion that misreads human nature. It overlooks the fact that man lives by the imagination, that the imagination—when not chaotic and futile—is exercised in the arts of life, that the objects of these arts are impersonal, and that to achieve these objects brings us a natural happiness.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Santayana George Santayana Egotism in German Philosophy — Chapter IX. Egotism and Selfishness (1916)

The fallacy of egotism begins with the inference that, therefore, a person can know only his ideas and can live only for his own benefit. On the contrary, what makes knowledge knowledge is that our sensibility may report something which is not merely our feeling; and our moral being arises when our interests likewise begin to range over the world. To deny that a man is capable of generosity because his generosity must be his own, is insufferable quibbling.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Santayana George Santayana Egotism in German Philosophy — Chapter IX. Egotism and Selfishness (1916)

Even our vanities and follies are disinterested in their way; their egotism is not a calculated selfishness. When a man orders his tomb according to his taste, it is not in the hope of enjoying his residence in it.
Max Stirner, while deprecating all subordination of the individual to society, expected people, even after they were emancipated, to form voluntary unions for specific purposes, such as playing games. Did he think that such companionship and co-operation would go without gregarious feelings and ideal interests? Would not a player wish his side to win?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature