Heinrich Karl Schmitt

Summary

Heinrich Karl Schmitt The Hungarian Revolution (1918)

Tisza died like a man who is at one with his destiny. Hungary can always be proud to have had such a despot, who knew not only how to apply force to others, but was also able and willing to take himself the last infinite consequences. He hated in his life the cowardice of others, in the theatre of war he was the best-loved of his soldiers, and he accepted death as the close of a career, whose gigantic worth was too absolute for it to have attained to maturity in our days.
It was a satisfying sign that the Government took the sharpest vengeance on the murder.
Source: Wikisource

Heinrich Karl Schmitt The Hungarian Revolution (1918)

It was felt that the least discrediting of the Revolution must lead to counter-tendencies and counter-actions, too, on the side of the Entente; and this danger ever in view, side by side with the instinct of self-preservation, stamped so deeply upon the general consciousness the necessity of ensuring order, that finally the bloodless Revolution became the symbol of the Temple of Freedom, to rear which without disturbance was not only aimed at, but it seemed to become possible only as a result of bloodlessness.
Source: Wikisource

Heinrich Karl Schmitt The Hungarian Revolution (1918)

But if one is to judge every statesman who ruled by force and failed, of success, one will have to damn every second leader of men from antiquity to our days. To judge him is for the future. He failed, he had to fall—but to die? The guilt of Berlin and the Ballplatz, of generations, and methods of education, and guiding traditions, and tendencies is to be judged by the event, which is not to be expiated by the murder of a single man. Tisza was named a criminal and traitor to his country—he was apotheosised—upon him were flung stones and roses, as to few others.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature