Summary

Inductiveload/Archives/2021

“ I also don't think that the WS model is that a user has to do all the work by themselves. It takes time to find the best scans for a work, more time to create the metadata, even more time to upload them, even more time to create a pagelist, and a huge amount of time to proofread the volume. Each one of these steps can be done by a separate user. Batch uploading the volumes without placing all the burden of creating the pagelists on either yourself or myself will enable more users to help out. ”
Source: Wikisource

Inductiveload/Archives/2021

“ However, we currently have no one place we can put all the data, or even a solid idea of how to split data between Commons, WD and WS index pages in the general case. Which has lead to "some people" (i.e. me) saying "sod it" and just not bothering too much. I try to get the file metadata for scans to be reasonable, but since I don't even know what best practices are, I leave it at that for files. For "easy" works like a single volume novel, WD can hold pretty much all of it in the work/edition structure, and only things like the pagelist need to be done at the file (or Index) level. ”
Source: Wikisource

Inductiveload/Archives/2021

“ Living the in the real world as we do, it's substantially more likely that someone will create an article or two than will plough though an entire volume or even issue. Especially as we get more periodicals that aren't just text and images in simple layouts. If you told me as a new user I had to proofread an entire issue to get one single article transcluded, I'd get 2 pages into the rest of the volume, lose heart and leave. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature