Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v…

In the cause now under consideration the record discloses facts sufficient to show a maritime tort to which the general admiralty jurisdiction would extend save for the provisions of the state Compensation Act; but the matter is of mere local concern and its regulation by the state will work no material prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law. The act prescribes the only remedy
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v…

Par. 1, § 3 of the statutes declares:
'The employees of a subscriber shall have no right of action against their employer for damages for personal injuries, and the representatives and beneficiaries of deceased employees shall have no right of action against such subscribing employer for damages for injuries resulting in death, but such employees and their representatives and beneficiaries shall look for compensation solely to the association, as the same is hereinafter provided for.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v…

It also prescribes a schedule of weekly payments for injured employees or their beneficiaries, and provides for a board to pass upon claims and an ultimate right to proceed in court. Subscribers' employees do not contribute to the necessary costs of such protection. They are presumed to accept the plan and to waive all right to recover damages for injuries at common law or under any statute unless they give definite written notice to the contrary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature