Summary

Jean-Henri Müntz Encaustic: Or, Count Caylus's method of painting in the manner of the ancients (1760)

It is not my intention to quarrel or depreciate oil painting, nor will I attempt to deny its true merit; therefore hope it will not be considered as a crime to propose a method that will equal its perfections, and surpass it for duration and stability of colours. I tell artists what I know, they may do what they judge proper. Though I bestow encomiums upon my subject it is not with a design to impose
Source: Gutenberg

Jean-Henri Müntz Encaustic: Or, Count Caylus's method of painting in the manner of the ancients (1760)

Hence it comes that most of our dictionaries on arts and sciences, and the greatest number of books on painting, are so perplexing; and in many a point rival Pliny in obscurity.
To write upon a subject and unfold its mystery, one ought to be practically acquainted with it; a superficial drawing is not enough; to teach others how to go to work, the section is wanted.
Source: Gutenberg

Jean-Henri Müntz Encaustic: Or, Count Caylus's method of painting in the manner of the ancients (1760)

Society by a member of that learned body, who accompanied it with a series of very acute and learned observations, which, with an extensive knowledge, shew an inclination to prove that the count’s method could not be the encaustic of the ancients, and that encausto pingendi could be nothing else but enameling.——
It is neither my business nor intention to enter into discussions; it would be too difficult a task to prove that the count’s invention comes up to Pliny’s meaning; no certain evidence can be brought neither for nor against it.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature