Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Scales v. United States (367 U.S. 203…

The teaching was that any teaching, any theory of a peaceful road to socialism, or a growing over from capitalism to socialism was a betrayal of the working class and that the Communist Party leading the working class would have to arm it in the first place with the theory that the workers must know and must be prepared to know that they can only take power forcibly.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Scales v. United States (367 U.S. 203…

Surely, then, the evidence of the Party's teaching that the Negro population should be given the right to form a separate nation is not irrelevant to the issue of whether or not the Party's program as a whole constituted a call to stand in readiness for violent action, when this particular plank in the platform was intended as baitf or one of the substantial battalions in the hoped-for revolutionary array. Of course, the preaching that the Negro population in the South has the right to form a separate nation does not of itself constitute illegal advocacy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Scales v. United States (367 U.S. 203…

If it is said that the mere existence of such an enactment tends to inhibit the exercise of constitutionally protected rights, in that it engenders an unhealthy fear that one may find himself unwittingly embroiled in criminal liability, the answer surely is that the statute provides that a defendant must be proven to have knowledge of the proscribed advocacy before he may be convicted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature