John Marshall Harlan II

John Marshall Harlan II

Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II United States v. W. M. Webb, Inc…

The parties agree that both the FICA and the FUTA impose taxes on employers measured by the compensation paid to employees, and that in terms of this case the two statutes define 'employee' identically. In the FICA 'employee' is defined to include 'any individual who, under the usual common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee relationship, has the status of an employee,' and the language of the FUTA is to the same effect.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II United States v. W. M. Webb, Inc…

The Senate Report quoted with approval the then-existing regulation, substantially identical to the one now in effect, [14] which stated:
'Every individual is an employee if the relationship between him and the person for whom he performs services is the legal relationship of employer and employee.
'Generally such relationship exists when the person for whom services are performed has the right to control and direct the individual who performs the services, not only as to the result to be accomplished by the work but also as to the details and means by which that result is accomplished.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature