John McLean, Le Roy v. Tatham (63 U.S. 132)…
“ Alderson B. Webster's Patent Cases, 342, says: 'The distinction between a patent for a principle and a patent which can be supported is, that you must have an embodiment of the principle in some practical mode described in the specification of carrying into actual effect; and then you take out your patent, not for the principle, but for the mode of carrying the principle into effect.''It is quite true, that a patent cannot be taken out solely for an abstract philosophical principle-for instance, for any law of nature or any property of matter, apart from any mode of turning it to account. ”
