Kenneth W. Goadby

Summary

Kenneth W. Goadby Lead poisoning and lead absorption (1912)

I plead none the less for an impartial investigation of the symptoms presented by a lead-worker, before assigning full or even partial responsibility of the disease to the occupation. If any and every departure from the normal in a lead-worker is at once assigned—the occupation being known—to plumbism, early diagnosis naturally presents very few difficulties to the exponents of such methods. And however severely we may condemn in the abstract such a careless, unscientific attitude, the tendency has, in practice, to be reckoned with and combated.
Source: Gutenberg

Kenneth W. Goadby Lead poisoning and lead absorption (1912)

The experiments definitely bring out one all-important fact—namely, that lead dust circulating in the air is many times more dangerous than lead actually swallowed; for even if the animals which were exposed to the inhalation of dust swallowed the whole of the quantity contained in the respired air, they would only obtain one-tenth of the amount the other fed animals were getting. It is, of course, impossible to suppose that the whole of the lead contained in the inhaled air reached the lung. It can only have been the smaller particles which did so.
Source: Gutenberg

Kenneth W. Goadby Lead poisoning and lead absorption (1912)

In the chapter on Pathology, the effect of alcohol on the kidney was cited as a common predisposing cause of kidney disease in lead-workers, and the effect of alcoholic excess in the case of a person who is already the subject of chronic lead absorption may determine the change from absorption to definite poisoning, because of alteration in the excreting-power of the kidney. So long as the ratio between ingestion and excretion is maintained the balance is kept up, and, although the tissues of the body may show signs of a certain amount of degeneration, no definite disease is produced
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature