Summary

O. Larsell Oregon Historical Quarterly, Volume 46… (1945)

The state tried to meet its responsibility for those unable to care for them selves, but the institution continued to be an asylum, both in nature and name, rather than a hospital. The question of responsibility of the state for the mentally ill whose families were able to pay for their care was the subject of some discussion in 1901. Many of the county courts had been committing insane patients to the state asylum against the wishes of relatives able and willing to provide them with private care.
Source: Wikisource

O. Larsell Oregon Historical Quarterly, Volume 46… (1945)

A majority of the people evidently took the view expressed by the Oregonian that the primary purpose of maintaining a state asylum was not a charitable one, but protection of lives and property from the violence of those who become mentally unbalanced, and protec tion of the patient from himself.24 Treatment of insanity for curative results was in its infancy. The unfortunates who must be committed to the institution for the protection of themselves and society could have little hope of betterment.
Source: Wikisource

O. Larsell Oregon Historical Quarterly, Volume 46… (1945)

In response to a petition dated January 23, 1855, signed by many of the leading citizens of the territory, an act was passed on January 30 making the insane the wards of the territory, the expenses of. those unable to pay to be met from the territorial treasury. The principle of maintenance of the insane by the state thus was adopted early in its history. This act, how ever, was repealed January 7, 1856, and the burden of financial responsibility was thrown back on the estates of the individuals or the counties in which they resided if the estates were inadequate.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature