Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Chicago St. Railway Company v. McCaull-Dinsmore Company…

Obviously there can be no propriety in attaching to one commodity unreasonable rates for the purpose of compensating a carrier for a risk attaching to it in the transportation of another commodity, and it is admitted that the carriers cannot make any accurate statement in advance as to the added cost, if any, of the increased liability.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Chicago St. Railway Company v. McCaull-Dinsmore Company…

For many years, if not, indeed, from the origin of railroad transportation in this country, common carriers by railroad have sought, by provisions in shipping contracts, bills of lading, tariff publications, etc., to limit their common-law liability, not only as insurers against loss or damage to property received by them for transportation, but also as tort-feasors for loss or damage caused by their negligence.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature