Summary

Owen J. Roberts Straton v. New — Opinion of the Court

Though a lien be not discharged by bankruptcy, its owner may not, without the bankruptcy court's permission, institute proceedings in a state court to enforce it, since his so doing might interfere with the orderly administration of the estate. Thus a mortgagee will be restrained from instituting or proceeding further in a foreclosure action, begun after the date of the petition in bankruptcy. [1] And a creditor holding a valid judgment more than four months old will be enjoined from enforcing its lien by suit brought after the date of the petition.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Straton v. New — Opinion of the Court

This statute says nothing about a distribution of assets amongst general creditors. It contains no provision that lien claims presented which cannot be paid because the proceeds of the sale are insufficient shall be wiped out as debts of the defendant. It does not purport to discharge the debtor from his indebtedness generally. It is merely a proceeding in equity to do what would be done by a sheriff or marshal under an appropriate writ for the sale of real estate in execution at law.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Straton v. New — Opinion of the Court

If a lien-holder, after notice has been given of the proceeding as required by the statute, does not appear and present his claims he is barred from participation, except that if a surplus remain after the payment of claims presented he may share in such surplus upon proving his claim at any time before final decree. There is also a provision for the presentation and participation of lien claims where judgment has been recovered before final decree in the creditors' action.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature