Parliament of Singapore

Summary

Parliament of Singapore Community Disputes Resolution Act 2015 (2015)

In deciding whether it is just and equitable for any order to be made under subsection (1) , the court is to consider all the following matters:
(a) the impact of the order, if made, on— (i) the respondent; (ii) any individual who, at the time of the making of the order, resides in the same place of residence as the respondent; and (iii) any other person who can reasonably be expected to be affected by the order; (b) the ordinary instances of daily living that can be expected to be tolerated by reasonable persons living in Singapore; (c) any other matters as the court deems fit.
Source: Wikisource

Parliament of Singapore Community Disputes Resolution Act 2015 (2015)

Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (7) for failure to comply with an order to enter into a bond, the failure to comply with that order is not punishable as a contempt of court.
(9) A person is not to be convicted of an offence under subsection (7) in respect of any non‐compliance which has been punished as a contempt of court.
(10) In this section, “relevant court”, in relation to an application for a special direction, means the court of first instance which heard the claim under section 4 (whether or not the claim was allowed) , or its equivalent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature