Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart City of Greenwood v. Peacock — Opinion of the Court

The phrase 'For any act' was substituted in 1948 for the phrase 'for any arrest or imprisonment or other trespasses or wrongs.' Like the 'officer * * * or other person' provision, the language specifying the acts on which removal could be grounded had, with minor changes, persisted until 1948 in the civil rights removal statute since its original introduction in the 1866 Act. The language of the original Civil Rights Act-' arrest or imprisonment, trespasses, or wrongs'-is pre-eminently the language of enforcement.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart City of Greenwood v. Peacock — Opinion of the Court

But there are many other remedies available in the federal courts to redress the wrongs claimed by the individual petitioners in the extraordinary circumstances they allege in their removal petitions. If the state prosecution or trial on the charge of obstructing a public street or on any other charge would itself clearly deny their rights protected by the First Amendment, they may under some circumstances obtain an injunction in the federal court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature