Summary

Samuel Nelson The Sutter Case — Opinion of the Court

And having made grants of much more land than he had, it was plain that whatever decision was made as to their respective precedence, many persons would be losers, under circumstances of much hardship as respected some of them. The District Court, in directing a location in the manner just mentioned, intended that the several selections which Sutter himself was considered to have made by settlement, or by lease or sale, or other acts of ownership, should be adopted, and in the order in which they were made, until the whole quantity of eleven leagues was exhausted.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Nelson The Sutter Case — Opinion of the Court

The description given of the location and boundaries of the tract in the petition of Sutter, in the grant to him, and in several deeds executed by him, exclude all land lying south of the American River.
The 'margins of the Feather River,' as called for on the east, make the banks of the Feather the boundary there. 'MARGIN' means edge, rim, border, not a strip of land. Besides, the margins, whatever they may be, are excluded. The land granted goes to them and leaves them out, not over them, so as to take them in.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Nelson The Sutter Case — Opinion of the Court

The grant must be located in a compact body, wholly at whatever point of location may be made necessary by the decree and by the other facts controlling the location. If the location is include the north end of the tract, then it must begin there, and extend south in a compact body for quantity. If, on the contrary, the location is to include the south end of the tract, then it must begin there and go north in a compact body for quantity.
The survey approved by the District Court violates these regulations in every particular. It is an ingenious attempt to do the impossible.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature