Supreme Court of the United States

Summary

Supreme Court of the United States United States Reports, Volume 1 {1 Dall… (1790)

In a state of society private property yields to the general good; but this is not the cafe in a state of nature; and, therefore, it may be taken as an axiom, that where the act of a particular nation vests in itself the property of an individual, whether a subject or not, the right, thus acquired, extends no further than the jurisdiction of that nation, and the act on which it is founded can have no extra-territorial force.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the United States United States Reports, Volume 1 {1 Dall… (1790)

Hence it was concluded that if process against an ambassador be null and void, a fortiori, shall it be void if issued against a sovereign.
That the true reason of the minister’s exemption from process is the independence and sovereignty of the person he represents. And although by engaging in trade, he may so far divest himself of his public character, as to subject these goods to attachment, yet in every case where he represents his master, his property is sacred. But a sovereign cannot subject himself by implication: he must do it expressly.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the United States United States Reports, Volume 1 {1 Dall… (1790)

The Attorney General, in reply, observed, that by the pleadings in a civil action, the issue must be redued to a single point; and he admitted that in all indictments for treason, an overt act must be laid and proved. But, he contended, that it was unnecessary to fill the indictment with a detail of the whole evidence in support of the prosecution; for, if the charge is reduced to a reasonable certainty, it is all that justice can require, and it is all to be found in any former precedent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature