Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Company Limited…

In view of this, we cannot hold that merely because Waialua uses a method ordinarily not associated with agriculture-a railroad-to transport the cane from the fields to the mill, it has forfeited its agriculture exemption. Where a farmer thus uses extraordinary methods, we must look to the function performed. Certainly no one would argue that the agriculture exemption did not apply to farm laborers who took the cane to the plant in wheelbarrows.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Company Limited…

The Court recognizes that the large size of Waialua's plantation makes necessary the specialization of labor incidental to its sugar cane production and marketing. Mere size and mechanization of Waialua's farming operations are not, in themselves, grounds for excluding any of its employees from the agricultural exemption. As I see it, the statutory definition of agriculture describes a major activity which lies beyond the outer limits of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 'Agriculture' is not an exception carved out of the jurisdiction of the Act.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature