United States Tax Court

Summary

United States Tax Court Meyer v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6667-78… (1986|noyearcat)

They point out that suspicious circumstances may only be used as a cause to scrutinize a transaction and are not relevant in determining whether a transaction should be recognized for tax purposes. While claiming that these transactions were all at arm's length, petitioners argue that a transaction not at arm's length is merely an indication that it may be appropriate to scrutinize the transaction and does not in and of itself cause the transaction not to be one of substance.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Meyer v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6667-78… (1986|noyearcat)

They also rely on the notes to establish that the claimed indebtedness was an indebtedness of Talmud.
From their analysis of the evidence, petitioners conclude that they have established a prima facie case for the interest deduction and that it is incumbent on respondent to go forward with evidence to show that the amount is not properly deductible as interest. Petitioners then argue that respondent has not met his burden of going forward with evidence to show that the transaction was not in substance what it purported to be.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Meyer v. C.I.R. Docket Nos. 6667-78… (1986|noyearcat)

At the time, Gerald Schulman was organizing limited partnerships to acquire properties which were occupied by a credit-worthy tenant on a long- term lease paying a sufficient rental for the loan on the property to be paid from rental receipts. Mr. Schulman considered such properties appropriate to be placed in a limited partnership to be formed by him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature