W.H.R.Rivers

Folk-Lore (1919 (vol. 30), 1920 (vol. 31))

Summary

W.H.R.Rivers,  Folk-Lore (1919 (vol. 30), 1920 (vol. 31))

“ If I am right in my interpretation of the association of burial-place, pyramid and image in Easter Island and San Cristoval it will become necessary to understand why the human image, which is not very conspicuous in the Solomons, should have become the imposing statue of Easter Island. ”
Source: Wikisource

W.H.R.Rivers,  Folk-Lore (1919 (vol. 30), 1920 (vol. 31))

“ In such a case as that of the statues of Easter Island we cannot expect certainty when we seek for the motive which inspired people of long ago. But, if the statues were to serve as resting-places for the souls of the dead, the limitation of activities in other directions provides a reason for the presence of these images in islands so small that it must have been difficult to find that interest which makes human activity possible. ”
Source: Wikisource

W.H.R.Rivers,  Folk-Lore (1919 (vol. 30), 1920 (vol. 31))

“ In large islands, such as the Marquesas and Tahiti, the stone-workers would find many outlets for their energy and for the satisfaction of their religious and artistic impulses. There would be no reason why any one element of their culture should undergo hypertrophy; why their energies should take the direction of magnifying the images which, as I suggest, they may have trusted their souls would occupy when they were no longer living.
A little place like Easter Island, on the contrary, would give no outlet for the energies of the immigrants in an economic or social direction.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature