Summary

Portrait of William Benjamin Carpenter William Benjamin Carpenter Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

Notwithstanding, therefore, the apparently wide divergence of the cyclical Orbitolites, the helical Orbiculina, the fusiform Alveolina, and the simply-chambered Peneroplis and Dendritina, these several types must be regarded as most intimately related to one another; and that relationship seems to me much more likely to have arisen from a common ancestral descent, than from the original creation of independent types, capable of graduating into each other so continuously as almost to assume each other's characters.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Benjamin Carpenter William Benjamin Carpenter Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

I am not acquainted with any other group of natural objects in which such ready comparison of great numbers of individuals can be made; and I am much mistaken if there be a single species of plant or animal, of which the range of variations has been studied by the collocation and comparison under one survey of so large an assemblage of specimens as have passed under review in the course of these investigations.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Benjamin Carpenter William Benjamin Carpenter Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

Now the modifications which any single type of Foraminifera must have undergone, to give origin to the whole series of diversified forms now presented by that group, are not greater in comparison with the modifications of which we have direct evidence, than are those which the advocate for the specific unity of the human races has no hesitation in assuming as the probable account of their present divergence.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature