Summary

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Davis v. Gaines — Opinion of the Court

The court having power to make the decree, it can only be impeached for fraud in the party who obtains it; a purchaser under it is not bound to look beyond the decree; if there is error in it of the most palpable kind, if the court which rendered it have in the exercise of jurisdiction disregarded, misconstrued, or disobeyed the plain provisions of the law which gave them the power to hear and determine the case before them,-the title of a purchaser is as much protected as if the adjudication would stand the test of a writ of error.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Davis v. Gaines — Opinion of the Court

There is an absolute failure of proof to establish any bad faith on the part of the purchasers of the property in dispute. They acted as if they believed that they were getting a good title to the property, for they agreed to pay, and did pay, what at that time was an immense sum of money for it, to wit, $120,000.
The good faith of the Fortiers being beyond question, they and those claiming under them have the right to rely upon the preseription of five years to cure any irregularity in the proceedings which resulted in the sale.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Davis v. Gaines — Opinion of the Court

To allow the heir or the devisee of a mortgagor, under the circumstances of this case, to recover the property without repaying the money for which it had been sold, and which had been paid by a bona fide purchaser, and had been applied to clear the property of a mortgage which rested upon it, and for which the estate of the mortgagor was bound, would be most inequitable and unjust. It would be an utter disregard of the rule that they who seek equity must do equity. No support for such a decree can be found in the adjudged cases.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature