Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Security Trust Company v. Black River National Bank…

As well might it be claimed that the branch of a tree can live and put forth its leaves and blossoms after its roots are dead, as to claim that the office of administrator can survive the jurisdiction of the court over the estate of which administration was granted. It is not necessary for the probate court, if it could do so, to retain jurisdiction to enforce its final decree of distribution
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Security Trust Company v. Black River National Bank…

All that was before the circuit court of the United States was an action at law upon a cause of action against a decedent's estate, which, under the laws of the state of Minnesota, could not be maintained in the courts of that state, because barred by the operation of the laws of the state regulating the administration of the estates of deceased persons. Moreover, it is obvious, and it has always been held, that the circuit court cannot, in the trial of an action at law, exercise the power of a court of equity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature