by the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Summary

by the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio McArthur v. Allen (1880)

Every one interested, if he choose to do so, may make himself a party to the record. Nothing is in question but the legal status of the will. That instrument is the res of the controversy, and in the absence of fraud all persons concerned, whether formally before the court as parties or not, are necessarily alike concluded by the verdict.
“Substantially this is a proceeding in rem, and the court cannot take jurisdiction of the subject-matter by fractions. The will is indivisible, and the verdict of a jury establishes it as a whole or wholly sets it aside.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio McArthur v. Allen (1880)

The power to hear and determine a cause is jurisdiction. It is coram judice whenever a case is presented which brings this power into action. * * * * If the law confers the power to render a judgment or decree, then the court has jurisdiction. * * * * But on a proceeding to sell the real estate of an indebted estate there are no adversary parties.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio McArthur v. Allen (1880)

There is no saving as to after-born children, and we cannot recognize their right to interfere, as they are seeking to do in this case, without interpolating into the statute what it does not contain. If the result be not as we have suggested, cases may be readily imagined where there might be successive births through many years, and each child when born would have a right to renew the litigation touching the validity of the decree annulling a will.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature