William Francis Thomas Butler

Summary

William Francis Thomas Butler Confiscation in Irish history… (1917)

To confiscation and colonisation England owes a constant drain on her resources, a vulnerable point in her defences, a hostile sentiment with which in every crisis of her history she has had to reckon. On the other side are to be set untold sufferings, rivers of blood and tears; but in the long run, while we can see much loss, it may be possible also to see a not inconsiderable gain, not indeed to the landowning class, but to the people of Ireland.
Source: Wikisource

William Francis Thomas Butler Confiscation in Irish history… (1917)

The sufferings of individuals, even of whole classes, from the effects of confiscation were greater perhaps than we can now conceive. In spite of some mitigating features, such as I have mentioned, the condition of the greater part of the population all through the eighteenth and for the greater part of the nineteenth century was indescribably wretched.
Yet, after all, two or three centuries are but a short span in the life of a people. In more than one country that space of time has seen a revolution in the ownership of land as sweeping as we have seen in Ireland.
Source: Wikisource

William Francis Thomas Butler Confiscation in Irish history… (1917)

In scarcely any other country of Europe was the power of the landowner so absolute. It was not checked by any manorial system such as prevailed in England, nor by any communal system such as we find on the Continent. The Irish peasant stood alone in an individual relationship to the landlord. He had no rights based on immemorial custom, and strengthened by being enjoyed by an organised community. The German or Hungarian serf, the English manorial tenant formed part of a definite organisation, recognised by the law, possessing certain rights as against the landowner.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature