Summary

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Wuchter v. Pizzutti — Opinion of the Court

We have also recognized it to be a valid exercise of power by a state, because of its right to regulate the use of its highways by nonresidents, to declare, without exacting a license, that the use of the highway by the nonresident may be statute be treated as the equivalent of the appointment by him of a state official as agent on whom process in such a case may be served.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Wuchter v. Pizzutti — Opinion of the Court

Otherwise, where the service of summons is limited to a service of the secretary of state or some officer of the state, without more, it will be entirely possible for a person injured to sue any nonresident he chooses, and through service upon the state official obtain a default judgment against a nonresident who has never been in the state, who had nothing to do with the accident, or whose automobile having been in the state has never injured anybody.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Wuchter v. Pizzutti — Opinion of the Court

The officer may decline to communicate with the person sued and give no notice whatever, not even by mail. A judgment might be obtained without the least knowledge of the person sued. Under the phrasing of the statute, the duty of the officer begins and ends in his office. If such a judgment were rendered, it could receive no recognition whatever at the place of the domicile. When a petition cannot legally be served on a defendant, the court can exercise no jurisdiction over him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature