William O. Douglas,
Cheff v. Schnackenberg — Dissent
“ So long as all contempts are lumped together, the serious nature of some contempts and the severity of the sentences commonly imposed in such cases control the legal character of all contempts. None can be regarded as petty. Distinctions between contempts which, after the fact, draw a six-month or greater sentence and those which do not are based on constitutionally irrelevant factors and seem irrelevant to the analysis.The Constitution, as I see it, thus requires a trial by jury for the crime of criminal contempt, as it does for all other crimes. ”
