William O. Douglas

William O. Douglas

Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Poe v. Ullman — Dissent

To stop experimentation and the testing of new decrees and controls is to deprive society of a needed versatility. Yet to say that a legislature may do anything not within a specific guarantee of the Constitution may be as crippling to a free society as to allow it to override specific guarantees so long as what it does fails to shock the sensibilities of a majority of the Court. [9]
The present legislation is an excellent example. If a State banned completely the sale of contraceptives in drug stores, the case would be quite different.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Poe v. Ullman — Dissent

These are his professional domains into which the State may not intrude. The chronicles are filled with sad attempts of government to stomp out ideas, to ban thoughts because they are heretical or obnoxious. As Mill stated, 'Our merely social intolerance kills no one, roots out no opinions, but induces men to disguise them, or to abstain from any active effort for their diffusion.' [6] When that happens society suffers. Freedom working underground, freedom bootlegged around the law is freedom crippled.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Poe v. Ullman — Dissent

Justice Holmes, dissenting, rightly said that 'a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism and the organic relation of the citizen to the State or of laissez faire. It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.' Lochner v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature