Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Robinson v. Fair — Opinion of the Court

We lay aside, as not open to dispute, the proposition that there is a difference between distribution and partition; and we are satisfied that that difference was in the mind of the legislature when it passed the original probate act, as well as when the Code of Civil Procedure was adopted. As correctly observed by counsel, distribution neither gives a new title to property, nor transfers a distinct right in the estate of the deceased owner, but is simply declaratory as to the persons upon whom the law casts the succession, and the extent of their respective interests
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Robinson v. Fair — Opinion of the Court

The failure to repeat, in the order, the names of the minor children,-whatever force that objection might have had upon a direct appeal from the decree of partition,-is not a matter affecting the jurisdiction of the court over the subject-matter and the parties; for the petition, and the order appointing an attorney to represent the minors, contained the names in full of all interested in the proceedings for settlement, distribution, and partition.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature