Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Harvey v. Tyler — Opinion of the Court

However it might pain us to see injustice perpetuated by a judgment which we are precluded from reviewing by the absence of proper exceptions to the action of the court below, justice itself, and fairness to the court which makes the rulings complained of, require that the attention of that court shall be specifically called to the precise point to which exception is taken, that it may have an opportunity to reconsider the matter and remove the ground of exception.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Harvey v. Tyler — Opinion of the Court

It is, that whenever it appears that a court possessing judicial powers has rightfully obtained jurisdiction of a cause, all its subsequent proceedings are valid, however erroneous they may be, until they are reversed on error, or set aside by some direct proceeding for that purpose. The only difficulty in applying the rule, is to ascertain the question of jurisdiction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Harvey v. Tyler — Opinion of the Court

We have already seen that they are courts of general jurisdiction. These sections authorize them, when certain facts are proved by the owner of the land, 'to render judgment in favor of such person, exonerating the land;' 'but no judgment shall be rendered except in the presence of the attorney for the commonwealth, or some other attorney appointed by the court to defend the interest of the commonwealth. If the application shall fail, judgment shall be rendered against the applicant, and he shall be adjudged to pay costs.' Now here are all the usual accompaniments of a judicial proceeding
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature