Summary

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

I am clearly of opinion that by the joint resolution of May 31st, 1870, congress intended that the grant of twenty sections per mile on each side of the road to aid in the construction of said road should be extended to the whole line of the road, including that part of the main line via the valley of the Columbia river, through Portland, to Puget sound.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

Again, there can be no question, under the authorities heretofore cited, that, if the act of forfeiture had not been passed by congress, the Atlantic and Pacific could yet construct its road, and that, constructing it, its title to these lands would become perfect. No power but that of congress could interfere with this right of the Atlantic and Pacific. No one but the grantor can raise the question of a breach of a condition subsequent.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

It is that the Oregon Central Railroad Company was without power under its charter to construct a railroad from Portland to Astoria, and, therefore, could not obtain the benefit of the grant made by congress of the lands in dispute. That corporation is not here seeking the aid of the court to invest it with title to real estate it could not legally acquire for the purposes of its charter.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature