Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Buttz v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

The only limitation upon the action of the United States with respect to the title of the Indians was that imposed by the act of congress, that they would extinguish the title as rapidly as might be 'comsistent with public policy and the welfare of said Indians.' Subject only to that condition, so far as the Indian title was concerned, the grant passed the fee to the company. In our judgment, the claims and rights mentioned in the third section are such as are asserted to the lands by other parties than Indians, having only a right of occupancy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Buttz v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

When the general route of the road is thus fixed in good faith, and information thereof given to the land department by filing the map thereof with the commissioner of the general land-office, or the secretary of the interior, the law withdraws from sale or pre-emption the odd sections, to the extent of 40 miles on each side. The object of the law in this particular is plain; it is to preserve the land for the company which, in aid of the construction of the road, it is granted.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Buttz v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company…

Assuming that the extinguishment of the Indian title to the lands in controversy many, so far as any claim to them against the United States is concerned, be held to have taken place at the date of the amended agreement,-taking the last date, when the Indians on the second reservation ratified it,-the defendant did not acquire any right of pre-emption by his continued settlement afterwards.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature