| override_contributor

Summary

| override_contributor Johnson v. McAdoo45 App. D.C. 440… (1916|noyear)

The nation pledged the world in the morning of our national life, that for the equality of the birth of all men, and the adherence to the declaration, that life liberty and the pursuit of individual happiness, were inalienable rights of all men, and to which sacred principles the American people pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor, and at that time made Almighty God their sacred witness.
Source: Wikisource

| override_contributor Johnson v. McAdoo45 App. D.C. 440… (1916|noyear)

If this court gives the plaintiffs the benefit of the very words of their bill, and not the assumptions indulged in by the language of the defendant, it will see: that plaintiffs-specifically alleged that this money was not the property, nor in any way an asset of the government, because it was accumulated in the treasury contrary to the constitution of the United States, and was not the property of the Government; the mere fact that some money is deposited in the federal treasury under a mistaken idea that it is legally there, does not make that money the property of the Government
Source: Wikisource

| override_contributor Johnson v. McAdoo45 App. D.C. 440… (1916|noyear)

There are new incidents arising each day of our lives in the general intercourse of public affairs, wherein there must be new precedents established to meet and settle meritorious contentions emanating from parties justifiably complaining. The fact that such a claim has never been asserted before, is the poorest kind of argument against the equity of a claim, otherwise meritorious.
The questions to be disposed of, are:
(1) Did the claimants labor to raise the cotton so taxed? (2) and did the tax so laid by the Congress, produce this money claimed by these claimants?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature