Council of Ephesus

Definition and stakes

T. W. Allies The Church of England cleared from the charge of Schism

But after Dioscorus, Bishop of Alexandria, the protector of Eutyches, had done every thing with violence and crime, and not a Council, but an assembly of robbers downright, had been held at Ephesus, then, when the Episcopal order had been divided, and the whole Church thrown into confusion, under the name of the Second Ecumenical Council of Ephesus, Leo himself admits that a new general Council must be held, which should either remove or mitigate all offences, so that there should no longer be either any doubt as to faith, or division in charity.
Source: Gutenberg

St John Damascene on Holy Images…

Things done by force are impositions, and do not carry persuasion. A proof of this was given in the 2nd Council of Ephesus, when a decree, which has never been recognised as valid, was enforced by the emperor’s hand, and blessed Flavian was put to death. Councils do not belong to kings, as the Lord says: ‘Wherever one or two are gathered together in My name, there I am in the midst of them.’ Christ did not give to kings the power to bind and to loose, but to the apostles, and to their successors and pastors and teachers.
Source: Gutenberg

Joseph Wilhelm A Manual Of Catholic Theology (1906)

Vincent of Lerins, when speaking of the Fathers quoted at the Council of Ephesus: “Only these ten, the sacred number of the commandments, were brought forward at Ephesus as teachers, counsellors, witnesses, and judges; [and the Council] holding their doctrine, following their advice, believing their testimony, and obeying their decision ... passed judgment concerning the rules of Faith” (n. 30) . The modern view which reduces the authority of the Fathers to that of mere historical witnesses could not better be refuted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature