Conspiracy theory

Definition and stakes

Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton,  What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates… (2023)

“ Conspiracy Theories Are Oppositional From the core definition of conspiracy theory as the belief that a conspiracy that the public should know about has been concealed from them, we can logically deduce a key defining characteristic. Conspiracy theories are set up, explicitly or implicitly, in opposition to a publicly accepted version of reality. They imply that a false version of reality has been promoted or protected by the conspirators and their unwitting stooges. ”
Source: Wikisource

Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton,  What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates… (2023)

“ Very often, the truth and public knowledge correspond. So the untruth/implausibility criterion leads to much the same decisions on specific conspiracy theories as our public knowledge criterion. Further, we acknowledge that there are downsides to our public knowledge criterion. One of these downsides is that this criterion is fuzzy: How many people, which members of the public, which public institutions, and what degree of conviction are enough to disqualify a belief as a conspiracy theory? ”
Source: Wikisource

Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton,  What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates… (2023)

“ Conspiracy Theories Are Social Constructs
As we have seen, each conspiracy theory is at its heart a moral, even political, claim about what the public should believe as opposed to the falsity they have been hoodwinked into accepting. Conspiracy theories are therefore inherently social not only in their content but also in their purpose: They are beliefs that people share in the hope of achieving social goals.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature