Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell

Biographical details

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

The perfect physiological type appears to be two rudiments on one blastoderm, whose entirely separate development produces twins (under their rarer circumstances) , whose nearly separate development produces such double monsters as the Siamese twins, and whose less separate development produces the various grotesque forms of two individuals in one body. There can be no question of a literal fusion of two embryos
Source: Wikisource

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

In many cases the muscles and viscera are not sufficient for the overgrown frame, and the individuals are usually, but not always, of feeble intelligence and languid disposition, and short-lived. The brain-case especially is undersized—the Irish giant in the museum of Trinity College, Dublin, is the single exception to this rule—but the bones of the face, and especially the lower jaw, are on a large scale. Giants are never born of gigantic parents; in fact, sterility usually goes with this monstrosity.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

More usually the union in the pelvic region is complete, and produces the most fantastic shapes of two trunks (each with head and arms) joining below at various angles, and with three or four lower limbs extending from the region of fusion, sometimes in a lateral direction, sometimes downwards. A very curious kind of double monster is produced by two otherwise distinct foetuses joining at the crown of the head and keeping the axis of their bodies in a line. It is only in rare instances that double monsters survive their birth, and the preserved specimens of them are mostly of foetal size.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature