Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell

Summary

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

The perfect physiological type appears to be two rudiments on one blastoderm, whose entirely separate development produces twins (under their rarer circumstances) , whose nearly separate development produces such double monsters as the Siamese twins, and whose less separate development produces the various grotesque forms of two individuals in one body. There can be no question of a literal fusion of two embryos
Source: Wikisource

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

In many cases the muscles and viscera are not sufficient for the overgrown frame, and the individuals are usually, but not always, of feeble intelligence and languid disposition, and short-lived. The brain-case especially is undersized—the Irish giant in the museum of Trinity College, Dublin, is the single exception to this rule—but the bones of the face, and especially the lower jaw, are on a large scale. Giants are never born of gigantic parents; in fact, sterility usually goes with this monstrosity.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Creighton and Peter Chalmers Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 18… (1911)

Cyclops, Siren, &c.—The same feebleness of the formative energy which gives rise to some at least of the cases of defective closure in the middle line, and to the cases of ambiguous sex, leads also to imperfect separation of symmetrical parts. The most remarkable case of the kind is the cyclops monster. At a point corresponding to the root of the nose there is found a single orbital cavity, sometimes of small size and with no eyeball in it, at other times of the usual size of the orbit and containing an eyeball more or less complete.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature