the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Biographical details

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Holt v. Sarver, 309 F. Supp. 362… (1970 | noyear)

Many penologists hold today that the primary purpose of prisons is rehabilitation of convicts and their restoration to society as useful citizens; those penologists hold that other aims of penal confinement, while perhaps legitimate, are of secondary importance. That has not always been the prevailing view of what penitentiaries are for, if, indeed, it is today. In years past many people have felt, and many still feel, that a criminal is sent to the penitentiary to be punished for his crimes and to protect the public from his further depredations.
Source: Wikisource

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Holt v. Sarver, 309 F. Supp. 362… (1970 | noyear)

Whether a ranker is trying to escape is at times subject to question, and the question is answered summarily by the guards. Thus, a ranker who unwittingly strays across an imaginary deadline may be fired upon. In addition to running the risk of being shot by an overzealous guard or by one with merely poor judgment there is always the possibility that a guard will deliberately murder an inmate on the pretense that he was trying to escape.
Source: Wikisource

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Holt v. Hutto, 363 F. Supp. 194… (1973 | noyear)

But when we come to severe penalties, such as reductions in classification, adverse changes in job assignments, loss of good time, and confinement in punitive isolation, the Court is impelled to the view that a black inmate is more likely than a white inmate to be subjected to such penalties, and if he is sentenced to punitive isolation, he is likely to stay there longer than is a white inmate.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature